Underage Drinking
Request a Free Consultation

Tailored Defense Strategies for Every Case

Our firm customizes defense strategies for each client's unique circumstances. From DUI's and other misdemeanors to serious felonies, we pride ourselves on obtaining exceptional results.

Home » DUI Defense » Underage Drinking

Underage Drinking Lawyers in Michigan

Did you know that police almost universally believe that a young person in high school or college out at night has been drinking or is about to drink alcohol? If you’re facing charges in Michigan, immediately speak with an underage drinking attorney.

This unfair presumption makes young adults under the age of 21 a target.

This article explains what a person under the age of 21 needs to know about the underage drinking in Michigan offense of MIP – Minor in Possession of Alcohol.

In the state of Michigan, an offense of Minor in Possession prohibits persons under the age of 21 to not only possess but also to consume alcohol and to have any amount of alcohol in their body.

The underage drinking in Michigan law prohibits the attempt to possess or consume alcohol by an underage person as well.

Facing underage drinking or a DUI charges? Unhappy with your current underage drinking attorney? Request a free consultation now.

underage drinking in michigan attorney

There are three primary ways that police enforce this law:

Actual or Constructive Possession of Alcohol

If a police officer personally witnesses a person under the age of 21 with a six-pack of beer, for example, this is actual possession of the alcohol and there’s not much more that can be argued.

But what if that six-pack is located in the back seat of a car with several people present?

Constructive possession means that a person had knowledge of the alcohol and had the ability to take actual possession of the alcohol.

Therefore, to prove that the passenger of the vehicle had possession of the six-pack located in the back seat, the police would have to prove that not only the passenger knew the beer was there but that they also had the ability to take possession of it where it was found.

If the beer was in a place that was inaccessible, then constructive possession cannot be proven.

Remember, proof of knowledge of the beer located in the back seat must be proven as well.

It’s not enough to presume knowledge.

If the passenger said, “I didn’t know the beer was there” and there’s nothing to prove otherwise, the passenger is not guilty of MIP.

The theories of actual versus constructive possession apply in all different factual circumstances like in a home or a park.

Charged with underage drinking or a DUI? Unhappy with your current underage drinking attorney? Request a free consultation now.

If you or a loved one has been charged with underage drinking in Michigan, request a free consultation by calling us now at (248) 206-5397.

Using a Preliminary Breath Test

The handheld Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) is frequently used by police to discover teenage drinking or determine if a person under the age of 21 has been drinking alcohol.

PBT’s are almost always carried by a police officer in their vehicle.

A teenager must remember that they don’t have to take a breath test or PBT and the only penalty is a civil infraction with a $100 fine.

To protect against being convicted of MIP a person should never submit to a breath test under any circumstances.

Even if a person hasn’t been drinking, PBTs can and will make mistakes.

The technology is not reliable enough for a prosecution of drunk driving in most states because they’re not highly reliable for several reasons.

For one, they’re not specific to ethyl beverage alcohol.

They can test positive for acetone which may be present if a person has diabetes or hypoglycemia.

They can also test positive for mouth alcohol instead of breath alcohol.

If a person just finished eating pizza, for example, the yeast in the pizza mixing with any sugar can cause fermentation of alcohol in your mouth.

Really, it happens all the time.

If the officer does not wait to give a PBT at least 15 minutes after eating, there could be a positive alcohol result even without drinking any alcohol.

PBTs also will detect alcohol from the surrounding (ambient) air. If alcohol, including products containing alcohol, was spilled and present in the immediate area it can cause a positive alcohol reading on a PBT.

Remember, you can’t be convicted without evidence.

Facing underage drinking or a DUI charges? Unhappy with your current underage drinking attorney? Request a free consultation now.

Call now and schedule a free consultation at (248) 541-2600.

Additional Defenses

A person under the age of 21 cannot be convicted of MIP under the following circumstances:

  • The place where the alcohol consumption occurred was legal for minors (like Canada).
  • If the minor initiated contact with law enforcement or emergency medical personnel for assistance with a legitimate health care concern.
  • If the minor presented themselves or accompanied another to a health care facility or agency for treatment of a medical condition.

The consumption of alcohol by a minor who’s enrolled in a course offered by an accredited postsecondary educational institution in an academic building of the institution under the supervision of a faculty member isn’t prohibited by this act if the purpose of the consumption is solely educational and is a requirement of the course.

An experienced underage drinking (MIP) attorney can help you understand that charges against you as well as your options.

Reviews From Our Clients

50+ Reviews, 5 Star Ratings

Bryan Smith

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 22, 2022

Barton was amazing and I could not have had the positive outcome without his guidance. His team is prompt and great to work with. He even called while out of the country on vacation, which I feel shows he went above and beyond what someone might expect from their attorney. Experienced and cares! I would highly recommend Barton!

Bryan Smith

Leng T.

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 22, 2022

Very professional. I came and spoke to Barton Morris about my situation and my case. I asked him if he was willing to help me. He asked about the details and my background and history. He give me a positive confidence he can help me and my odds. His price is reasonable. He’s not one of those hole in the wall lawyers who treat you as a number. You are a human being with a personal life. You treats you as a valued client no matter how big or small the case.

Leng T.

Kelly M.

Rated 5.0 out of 5
April 5, 2022

I had Mike Norman as my lawyer for a case. I just wanted to come on here and thank him for doing his best for me. I am grateful during this stressful time. I’ve used Barton Morris as a lawyer about 11 years ago and he was awesome which is why we came back. I do recommend!

Kelly M.

Thomas Smale

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 28, 2020

Extremely knowledgeable and very helpful when it comes to navigating the complicated nature of cannabis businesses in Michigan. I met with Barton where he answered all my questions about the pre-qualification application, and was prompt in answering subsequent questions through email after the meeting was completed. I certainly plan to continue utilize Barton’s knowledge in the future.

Marty Upfall

Thomas Smale

Marty Upfall

Rated 5.0 out of 5
November 10, 2020

Just sitting here on my balcony. A bit chilly but sunny and beautiful. I am ever so grateful to have 100% freedom. Wasn’t sure I would ever meet this day. Hiring you(and your team) was the best decision I have ever made. You are a true master of your trade. As you sit with your beautiful family on Thanksgiving know that this year I am truly thankful of my freedom and the choice to hire Barton Morris. Thanks again. I will never forget what you have done for me.

Marty Upfall
Call Us Now Message Us