Breath Testing Defense
Request a Free Consultation

Tailored Defense Strategies for Every Case

Our firm customizes defense strategies for each client's unique circumstances. From DUI's and other misdemeanors to serious felonies, we pride ourselves on obtaining exceptional results.

Home » DUI Defense » Breath Testing Defense

Breath Testing Defenses Lawyers in Michigan

A driver of a motor vehicle with a bodily alcohol content (BAC) of .08 percent or above is guilty of operating while intoxicated (OWI) or more commonly known as DUI or drunk driving. In this article we’re going to cover the types of breath test, accuracy, and breath testing defenses.

Facing DUI charges? Unhappy with your current attorney? Request a free consultation now.

The two predominant ways to determine a BAC is from a breath alcohol test or a blood alcohol test.

The most common way to determine BAC in a drunk driving prosecution is a breath alcohol test.

The only breath alcohol test that can be used as evidence against an accused in Michigan is called a Datamaster.

There are two types of Datamasters; the BAC and the newer DMT.

While a blood test is arguably more accurate and reliable, the breath test for BAC is more commonly used because…

  1. the test is easier to administer,
  2. the test can be performed by non-medical personnel, is less physically intrusive to the person taking the test, and
  3. it produces results faster.

However, under certain circumstances, breath tests can be less than reliable as an accurate measure of BAC.

The Datamaster, a machine used in the police station after a person has been arrested, tests the alcohol content of a person’s breath.

There are many ways to attack the accuracy and reliability of this test.

Below are several detailed ways an attorney can challenge the Datamaster test.

Facing DUI charges? Unhappy with your current attorney? Request a free consultation now.

The Operators Must be Properly Trained and Certified

First, only certified operators can operate the Datamaster machine.

Police departments must train and certify selected officers to operate the Datamaster.

There are several classes of operators, covering both preliminary breath test (PBTs) instruments and evidential breath test instruments.

The operators must go through training, which consists of one training course that takes one day.

Your attorney should always verify that the operator is certified to perform the functions that he or she performed in the defendant’s arrest, and that the operator’s certification was current.

It’s also important to determine that the officers administered the test strictly pursuant to their training.

They often don’t.

The Law Offices of Barton Morris owns breath operator training manuals for use in confronting the officers about how they aren’t following the rules.

If they aren’t administering the tests, the test results aren’t valid, not accurate and not reliable.

When a jury or judge sees this, it’s highly effective in getting cases dismissed.

The Operator Must Observe the Arrestee for Fifteen Minutes Before Administering the Datamaster Test

Second, according to the Michigan Administrative Rules regarding breath testing, a person may be administered a breath test using the Datamaster machine only after being observed for fifteen minutes by a police officer.

During this period, the officer must make sure the person hasn’t smoked, regurgitated, or placed anything in his or her mouth, except for the mouthpiece of the Datamaster machine.

Although the officer doesn’t need to stare continuously at the person, he must be close enough to know what the person is doing.

Otherwise, the officer has opened the door for breath testing defenses.

Taking the Datamaster Test

In preparation for the test, the operator must “purge” the machine. During this process, all chambers and internal plumbing are cleansed of any residual substances by surrounding air, which is pulled through the tube and pumped throughout the instrument. After purging, .000 will appear on the display.

The operator must be careful because the breath tube can act like a vacuum cleaner and suck in dirt on the counter. Also, if the driver smells like alcohol, the operator should move him or her from the immediate test area until the purging is complete. This can cause a false reading of alcohol.

When taking the test, the driver blows into a straw-like piece attached to the end of a tube that’s connected to the tabletop Datamaster machine. The person is then asked to blow into the tube for a second test. After the first test, a new individually wrapped mouthpiece must be used for the second test.

The accused can refuse the second test. Or, there may be an instance where a substance is found in the person’s mouth that would interfere with the test result. At which point, the officer must observe the arrestee for another 15 minutes and start the test again.

All of this can be seen in the booking video that your attorney should request from the arresting agency.

Obtaining the first test sample is enough to be admitted into evidence. The purpose of obtaining a second sample is to confirm the first sample. Confirmation is critical. If a second test is given, it must fall within an acceptable range depending on the reading. If the first two aren’t within an acceptable range, a third sample must be taken. The amount of acceptable variance depends on how high the results are.

Therefore, a way to challenge the Datamaster test results is if the results are beyond the acceptable variance.

You’re likely beginning to understand all that can and does go wrong with testing, and why breath testing defenses are so often an effective strategy.

Body Temperature Can Affect the Results

The premise of the Datamaster machine is very technical, using infrared spectroscopy.

The simplest explanation of the technology is that a light is beamed through the breath sample chamber.

The alcohol molecules are absorbed and a detector at the other end of the chamber measures how much light is left.

Then, a computer calculates the amount of alcohol percentage is in the breath sample.

Additionally, the device is designed and programmed to operate on several assumptions, including that the person has a normal body temperature.

The higher the body temperature, the higher the breath alcohol result.

This is another of the breath testing defenses that your attorney should look into.

Officers don’t check an arrestee’s temperature, but it could certainly have a significant impact on the results.

The Datamaster Must be Properly Calibrated and Maintained

Other breath testing defenses for Datamaster evidence is if the machine isn’t checked, tested and calibrated properly.

The Datamaster must be simulated at least once a week.

The machine is simulated when the officer attaches a device that produces a sample of air similar to the actual test.

Instead of a person, the simulator creates the “breath.”

In Michigan, the approved machines are the BAC Datamaster and the Datamaster DMT.

The state awarded a contract in 2008 for the DMT.

However, the DMT wasn’t put in service in police stations in Lansing until April 2012.

The administrative rules were amended in 2010 to reflect differences between the DMT and the Datamaster.

It’s no longer required that the check is performed by an appropriate operator, since the new machine is designed to conduct a self-check.

Despite this, the BAC Datamaster is still in use which requires the calibration by a human operator.

The weekly inspection verifies that the machine is operating accurately.

Essentially, calibration involves the operator attaching a separate small device to the Datamaster machine and then breathes into the breath tube of the Datamaster to make sure it works properly.

There’s an alcohol mix in the simulator device that provides the alcohol readings.

The operator must mix his or her own simulator solution for the required weekly tests.

The simulator then acts literally like a “simulated drunk.”

He or she must also check for leaks, simulator temperature, and equilibrate the simulator before using.

The simulator must be heated to 34 degrees Celsius.

Once the simulator is heated to the proper temperature, the operator must then blow into it vigorously.

This is to cool the air above the solution to equilibrate the temperature of the air and solution.

There is a water-based ethanol mix in the simulator that provides the alcohol readings.

The simulation must result in a sample that is between .076 and .084 grams per 210 liters of “breath.”

The test must not be high or low.

The operator is trained to take up to four tests if there are high or low readings.

If after the fourth test the results are still high or low, the operator must immediately notify his or her supervisor.

They also must notify a service representative and take the unit out of service only if advised to do so by the service representative.

If so, they then must place a sign in the unit noting “OUT OF SERVICE.”

All of this must be recorded in the simulator logbook to ensure accurate simulations.

As soon as you contact an attorney after your arrest, he or she should submit a request with the arresting police department for these logs.

The attorney should then inspect the logs to ensure that the Datamaster machine was properly calibrated each week.

Examination of the maintenance records frequently discovers the police agency is sloppy with their simulation protocols, record keeping and the often ignore error messages produced by the instrument.

The inability of the police to properly maintain their Datamaster can be very effective in demonstrating to a jury that a measurement is not reliable.

Each Machine Must be Tested Every 120 Days

The machine must also go through a more thorough inspection every 120 days.

The 120-day inspection can only be conducted by a specific class operator or authorized representative of the manufacturer.

For this 120-day test, the operator must check for accuracy at three different breath alcohol levels:

  1. 040,
  2. .080, and
  3. .200.

The operator must also check for acetone interference, radio interference, the time and date on the instrument and ensure that the thermometer is working.

Your lawyer should always order the 120-day maintenance records.

This is to verify the notes by the operator when he or she signs the calibration logs.

Chemical Interference and Breath Alcohol v. Mouth Alcohol

If the Datamaster detects a chemical substance other than ethanol, the test should be stopped, and the printout should indicate “INTERFERENCE DETECTED.”

The operator should start a new 15-minute observation period and go through the test procedure again.

There are different types of alcohol that could cause interference.

Ethyl alcohol, methyl alcohol and isopropanol are three of the most common.

Ethyl alcohol is what’s in alcoholic beverages, isopropyl alcohol is rubbing alcohol and methyl alcohol is the simplest form of alcohol that’s used in industrial processes.

The Datamaster assumes that the only volatile compound in the person’s breath is ethanol.

Although it’s supposed to be designed to detect other chemicals and produce an interference, the Datamaster isn’t, in fact, sophisticated enough to determine whether the compound that’s reacting to the infrared beam is one of the other forms of alcohol.

For example, if a person deals with alcohol for manufacturing and industrial purposes and that alcohol is on that person’s body, hands or clothing, it can factor into the alcohol reading on the Datamaster.

Breath alcohol is from deep lung air, while mouth alcohol is what’s left over in your mouth if you were to use mouthwash with alcohol.

To assure mouth alcohol isn’t present when giving the breath tests, most regulations require a 15-minute direct observation of the test subject to assure any mouth alcohol from consumption has been eliminated, as discussed above.

The concern for elimination of mouth alcohol is based upon the theory that mouth alcohol can be measured as breath alcohol.

Therefore, it invalidates the breath alcohol test results and opens the door to breath testing defenses.

Radio Frequency Interference

If the Datamaster detects any radio transmissions in the area that could interfere with a test result, the test should be stopped.

Both the display and the printout should indicate “RADIO INTERFERENCE.”

After the interference is gone, the operator must press the “run” key to initiate a new test.

In this case, a new 15-minute observation period isn’t necessary.

Sometimes, cell phones are being used in the booking room at the same time that the breath test is being administered.

The problem is that cell phones create radio waves, and these waves can interfere with the breath test.

Your lawyer should always order the booking videos to see if a cell phone was being used at the time of the breath test and challenge the test on those grounds.

This is another common reason for breath testing defenses.

Human Physiological Defenses

Many people have pre-existing medical conditions or circumstances that preclude an accurate and reliable breath alcohol analysis. A breath test shouldn’t be performed to people with the following conditions:

Diabetes – If suffering from low blood sugar, a diabetic could be in a state of ketoacidosis.

This elevates the amount of acetone in their blood, which can be mistaken for ethanol by the Datamaster

Hypoglycemia – Same possible ketoacidosis defense.

Active and persistent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder (GERD) – This causes alcohol to be expelled from the stomach and enters the mouth, at which point can be blown into the Datamaster if provided an analysis of mouth alcohol and not breath alcohol

Recent traffic accident with injury to mouth or head – Any possible blood in the mouth will possibly cause a mouth alcohol reading and not a breath alcohol analysis.

Recent and persistent regurgitation for any reason causing mouth alcohol to be tested instead of breath alcohol.

Dentures, mouth guards or dental issues that may trap alcohol in the mouth creating inaccurate breath alcohol testing.

Speak to a Michigan Drunk Driving Defense Lawyer

Our team of proven DUI attorneys is thoroughly familiar with proper testing procedure and the science behind all breath alcohol tests in the State of Michigan.

Therefore, they know which breath testing defenses to use in court to a prosecutor, judge or a jury.

Facing DUI charges? Unhappy with your current attorney? Request a free consultation now.

Request a free consultation now by calling us at (248) 940-3757.

Reviews From Our Clients

50+ Reviews, 5 Star Ratings

Bryan Smith

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 22, 2022

Barton was amazing and I could not have had the positive outcome without his guidance. His team is prompt and great to work with. He even called while out of the country on vacation, which I feel shows he went above and beyond what someone might expect from their attorney. Experienced and cares! I would highly recommend Barton!

Bryan Smith

Leng T.

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 22, 2022

Very professional. I came and spoke to Barton Morris about my situation and my case. I asked him if he was willing to help me. He asked about the details and my background and history. He give me a positive confidence he can help me and my odds. His price is reasonable. He’s not one of those hole in the wall lawyers who treat you as a number. You are a human being with a personal life. You treats you as a valued client no matter how big or small the case.

Leng T.

Kelly M.

Rated 5.0 out of 5
April 5, 2022

I had Mike Norman as my lawyer for a case. I just wanted to come on here and thank him for doing his best for me. I am grateful during this stressful time. I’ve used Barton Morris as a lawyer about 11 years ago and he was awesome which is why we came back. I do recommend!

Kelly M.

Thomas Smale

Rated 5.0 out of 5
December 28, 2020

Extremely knowledgeable and very helpful when it comes to navigating the complicated nature of cannabis businesses in Michigan. I met with Barton where he answered all my questions about the pre-qualification application, and was prompt in answering subsequent questions through email after the meeting was completed. I certainly plan to continue utilize Barton’s knowledge in the future.

Marty Upfall

Thomas Smale

Marty Upfall

Rated 5.0 out of 5
November 10, 2020

Just sitting here on my balcony. A bit chilly but sunny and beautiful. I am ever so grateful to have 100% freedom. Wasn’t sure I would ever meet this day. Hiring you(and your team) was the best decision I have ever made. You are a true master of your trade. As you sit with your beautiful family on Thanksgiving know that this year I am truly thankful of my freedom and the choice to hire Barton Morris. Thanks again. I will never forget what you have done for me.

Marty Upfall
Call Us Now Message Us