Michigan’s Red Flag Law, officially known as the Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO) Act, has been a source of intense controversy since its enactment in early 2024, especially among gun collectors, NRA members, and Second Amendment advocates. The law allows anyone from family members, police, mental health professionals, roommates and former dating partners to anonymously petition a judge to remove firearms from those they believe pose an imminent threat to themselves or others.
In just it’s first year, this new ERPO has come under scrutiny from lawmakers seeking its repeal. What makes Michigan’s Red Flag law particularly alarming is that firearms can be seized before a person has a chance to defend themselves in court. For many, this raises serious concerns about due process, false claims, and the potential for abuse, making it crucial for gun owners to understand their rights and stay informed.
While the intension of the ERPO Act is intended to temporarily remove guns from people with potentially violent behavior and prevent them from hurting themselves or others. This has obvious good intensions in regards to victims of domestic violence, and those showing signs of being a danger to the public, but how the law is written leaves many to question its constitutionality. Who can file a petition? Based on what grounds? Can law enforcement actually take my property without due process? Understanding these key details is crucial for anyone concerned about their Second Amendment rights. Here we have highlighted everything you need to know to ensure you’re as informed as possible.
For a deeper look at the law: Download Complete Overview of Michigan’s Red Flag Law (PDF)
The petitioner must fit into one of the following categories:
There are penalties for abuse of this law. If the petitioner knowingly and intentionally makes a false report they can be subject to a range of punishments, including a 93-day misdemeanor for first offense, 4-year felony for second offense, and 5-year felony for third and subsequent filing of false reports.
Learn What it Takes to Restore Your Second Amendment Rights.
The petitioner must show that the respondent (person receiving the order) can reasonably be expected within the “near future” to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure themselves or another individual by possessing a firearm. The respondent must have also engaged in an act, or acts, or made significant threats that support this expectation.
When considering a request, the Court considers the following factors for issuing an order to respondent:
Non-Immediate Surrender
Immediate Surrender
An individual who refuses or fails to comply with an ERPO is guilty of a felony, which includes 1-year felony for first offense, 4-year felony for second offense, and 5-year felony for third and subsequent offense.
If convicted, the court that issued the order shall issue an extended ERPO effective for 1 year after the expiration of the preceding order.
An individual who knowingly places a firearm in the possession of an individual who is restrained under an extreme risk protection order is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00, or both.
A restrained individual may file one (1) motion to modify or terminate an ERPO during the first six months and one motion to modify or terminate during the second six months. If the ERPO is extended, the restrained individual may file two additional motions during each of the respective six (6) month periods.
If terminated, the court order must state that respondent may reclaim any seized firearms.
An annual report was released in February providing the 2024 statistics under its first full year, showing that a total of 391 ERPO requests made in 2024, with 287 requests being approved. Most requests were emergency requests, permitting temporary confiscations before holding a hearing. Its these cases that trigger much of the opposition to the law, as they only require suspicion, based on what “might happen”, not that a crime has happened.
On March 5th, State Rep. James DeSana introduced a pair of bills to repeal the ERPO law, stating that it violates multiple constitutional rights, including our Second Amendment rights, as well as the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Call to repeal Michigan’s Red Flag Law- Read More
Understanding Michigan’s Red Flag law is essential for anyone concerned about protecting their Second Amendment rights — especially if you’ve had past legal issues and are working to restore your firearm privileges. Our legal team specializes in helping Michigan residents navigate this process and fight unfair accusations.
If you or anyone you know has been effected by Michigan’s Red Flag Law, contact the Law Offices of Barton Morris today.
President of the Michigan Association of OWI Attorneys Lead Award-Winning Team
Over Two Decades of Legal Experience with Michigan DUI Laws and Other Practice Areas.
We’ll Tackle Even The Most Challenging Cases and Refuse To Back Down.
We Have a Successful Track-Record Obtaining Favorable Outcomes For Our Clients.
Our Seasoned Trial Lawyers Aren’t Afraid To Go To Court & Fight For Your Rights.
Phone Number:
(248) 712-1156
© The Law Offices of Barton Morris. All rights reserved.