Michigan Minor in Possession of Alcohol Lawyers
Effectively Representing Minor Clients across Royal Oak
Did you know that police almost universally believe that a young person in high school or college out at night has been drinking or is about to drink alcohol? This unfair presumption makes young adults under the age of 21 a target. This page explains what a person under the age of 21 needs to know about the underage drinking offense of MIP – Minor in Possession of Alcohol.
In the state of Michigan, an offense of Minor in Possession prohibits persons under the age of 21 to not only possess but also to consume alcohol and to have any amount of alcohol in their body. The law prohibits the attempt to possess or consume alcohol by an underage person as well.
There are three primary ways that police enforce this law:
- Actual or constructive possession of alcohol – the police find you with it.
- Use of a Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) to determine a BAC over 0.02%.
- Seek admission from an underage drinker that they consumed alcohol.
Actual or Constructive Possession of Alcohol
If a police officer personally witnesses a person under the age of 21 with a 6 pack of beer, for example, that is actual possession of the alcohol and there is not much more that can be argued. But what if that six pack is located in the back seat of a car with several people present? Constructive possession means that a person had knowledge of the alcohol and had the ability to take actual possession of the alcohol. Therefore, to prove that the passenger of the vehicle had possession of the six pack located in the back seat, the police would have to prove that not only the passenger knew the beer was there but that they also had the ability to take possession of it where it was found. If the beer was in a place that was inaccessible, then constructive possession cannot be proven. Remember, proof of knowledge of the beer located in the back seat must be proven as well. It is not enough to presume knowledge. If the passenger said, “I did not know the beer was there” and there is nothing to prove otherwise, the passenger is not guilty of MIP. The theories of actual versus constructive possession apply in all different factual circumstances like in a home or a park.
Using a Preliminary Breath Test
The handheld Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) is frequently used by police to discover teenage drinking or determine if a person under the age of 21 has been drinking alcohol. PBT’s are almost always carried by a police officer in their vehicle. A teenager must remember that they do not have to take a breath test or PBT and the only penalty is a civil infraction with a $100 fine. To protect against being convicted of MIP a person should never submit to a breath test under any circumstances. Even if a person has not been drinking, PBTs can and will make mistakes. The technology is not reliable enough for a prosecution of drunk driving in most states because they are not highly reliable for several reasons. For one, they are not specific to ethyl beverage alcohol. They can test positive for acetone which may be present if a person has diabetes or hypoglycemia. They can also test positive for mouth alcohol instead of breath alcohol. If a person just finished eating pizza, for example, the yeast in the pizza mixing with any sugar can cause fermentation of alcohol in your mouth. Really, it happens all the time. If the officer does not wait to give a PBT at least 15 minutes after eating, there could be a positive alcohol result even without drinking any alcohol. PBTs also will detect alcohol from the surrounding (ambient) air. If alcohol, including products containing alcohol, was spilled and present in the immediate area it can cause a positive alcohol reading on a PBT.
A person under the age of 21 cannot be convicted of MIP under the following circumstances:
- The place where the alcohol consumption occurred was legal for minors (like Canada).
- If the minor initiated contact with law enforcement or emergency medical personnel for assistance with a legitimate health care concern.
- If the minor presented themselves or accompanied another to a health care facility or agency for treatment of a medical condition.
The consumption of alcohol by a minor who is enrolled in a course offered by an accredited postsecondary educational institution in an academic building of the institution under the supervision of a faculty member is not prohibited by this act if the purpose of the consumption is solely educational and is a requirement of the course. An experienced minor in possession lawyer in Michigan can help you understand that charges against you as well as your options.
The Right Firm Asks The Right Questions
What Sets The Law Offices of Barton Morris Apart?
Over Two Decades of Legal Experience Within A Variety of Practice Areas
We’ll Tackle Even The Most Challenging Cases & Refuse To Back Down
We Have a Successful Track-Record Obtaining Favorable Outcomes For Our Clients
Our Seasoned Trial Lawyers Aren’t Afraid To Go To Court & Fight For Your Rights
From Our Clients
50+ Reviews, 5 Star Ratings
Stop your Google search, pick up the phone and retain the services of the best criminal defense team in the state of Michigan. When you hire Barton Morris to represent you, you should be confident in knowing that the lawyers on his team will fight for your legal rights in every way possible. Mr. Morris and his associates legal knowledge is unsurpassed bar none. Although my case was unique, having been on the lam for sixteen years, Mr. Morris was able to prove that the lack of evidence was detrimental to the prosecution and all charges were dismissed. Mr. Morris happened to be the second lawyer that I contacted. The first lawyer said he would take my case for a $10K retainer fee and that I had a long road ahead of me. The next day, I contacted Mr. Morris and knew from our first conversation that I was in good hands with his representation. Stop shopping around and hire Barton Morris today!